Comparison of cartilage scoring and cartilage sparing techniques in unilateral otoplasty: a ten-year experience.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 23221973.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182503c38.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
We identified the optimal operative technique of unilateral otoplasty among cartilage-scoring or posterior-suturing methods. All unilateral otoplasties repaired in South East Scotland in 10 years were analyzed. Using visual analog scale, outcomes were scored by blinded professional panel and by patients. Case notes were interrogated for postoperative complications. Of 81 patients, 40 with full photographic records were included in the study. Cosmetic outcomes and symmetry scores in patients who underwent posterior suturing with fascial flap were significantly better than cartilage scoring and posterior suturing without fascial flap. Early complications were significantly more common in cartilage-scoring and posterior-suturing techniques without fascial flap than posterior suturing with fascial flap. In conclusion, posterior suturing with fascial flap represents cosmetically superior technique in unilateral otoplasty. It allows for intraoperative adjustment of posterior sutures, resulting in symmetric ears. The technique seems to be associated with fewer short-term complications, often responsible for pediatric patient distress.
Medical subject headings
- Ear Cartilage
- Otologic Surgical Procedures