Is it necessary to evaluate nuclei in HER2 FISH evaluation?
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 23270898.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1309/AJCPPXLYJVFGOV8I.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
A new method that simplifies the evaluation of the traditional HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) evaluation in breast cancer was proposed. HER2 status was evaluated in digital images (DIs) captured from 423 invasive breast cancer stained sections. All centromeric/CEP17 and HER2 gene signals obtained from separated stacked DIs were manually counted on the screen. The global ratios were compared with the traditional FISH evaluation and the immunohistochemical status. The 2 FISH scores were convergent in 96.93% of cases, showing an "almost perfect" agreement with a weighted k of 0.956 (95% confidence interval, 0.928-0.985). The new method evaluates at least 3 times more nuclei than traditional methods and also has an almost perfect agreement with the immunohistochemical scores. The proposed enhanced method substantially improves HER2 FISH assessment in breast cancer biopsy specimens because the evaluation of HER2/CEP17 copy numbers is more representative, easier, and faster than the conventional method.
Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast
- Cell Nucleus
- In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
- Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases