Evaluating evaluation: assessment of the American Board of Internal Medicine Resident Evaluation Form.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 2341920.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The American Board of Internal Medicine suggests use of a standard form to rate residents on nine dimensions (such as clinical judgment and overall clinical competence) on a scale of 1 to 9. The authors examined the psychometric evidence for reliability and validity of 1,039 ratings of 85 residents by 135 attendings in a single internal medicine residency program. Of these ratings, 95.6% were from 6 to 9. Factor analysis revealed that high correlations among the nine dimensions (r ranged from 0.72 to 0.92) resulted from a single global factor accounting for 86% of the variance. The study also examined whether the form reliably distinguishes among residents scoring between 6 and 9. Agreement among attendings rating the same individual was weak (average reliability = 0.64, by the method of James). The rating method fails to discriminate dimensions of clinical care and has low reliability for distinguishing among competent residents.
Medical subject headings
- Clinical Competence
- Internal Medicine
- Internship and Residency