Evidence on prognosis.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 23446575.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31827c6f90 and PMC identifier 4791582.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
In the clinical decision-making process, prognostic information gives physicians guidance regarding disease and treatment that can be passed along to patients. Using the clinical scenario of a type IIIB open tibial fracture as an example, this article focuses on how to search prognostic literature effectively and how to critically appraise prognostic studies. A well-built clinical question using the Patients, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes methodology helps plastic surgeons derive information from the vast resources in an effective and time-efficient manner. Subsequent critical appraisal of the collected studies is the essential step for identifying the most relevant high-quality evidence to provide the best prognostic information to guide patient decision-making.
Medical subject headings
- Evidence-Based Medicine
- Orthopedic Procedures
- Prognosis
- Plastic Surgery Procedures
Anatomy
- ankle