Prospective study of the effectiveness and durability of carotid endarterectomy.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 2348726.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
In a series of 252 consecutive patients who underwent 282 carotid endarterectomies, we conducted clinical and angiographic follow-up for 2 to 6 years (mean, 3.2 years). Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was done postoperatively in 95% of cases. Clinical follow-up was achieved in 97% of cases, and DSA follow-up was obtained in 66% of cases. The overall group had a 1% operative minor morbidity (three cases of minimal new neurologic deficit), no major morbidity, and a 0.7% mortality (one death from stroke and one from myocardial infarction). Complications correlated well with the patient's preoperative risk category. During follow-up, 10 minor strokes, only 1 of which was attributable to the reconstructed artery, and 10 transient ischemic attacks, 3 of which were presumably related to recurrent stenosis, occurred. Asymptomatic mild to moderate restenosis of the internal carotid or common carotid artery was identified in 10% of follow-up DSAs and severe stenosis or occlusion in 3%. Stenosis in the opposite common carotid or internal carotid artery progressed in 48 cases (26% of follow-up DSAs and ultrasound studies), and 10 of these became symptomatic. An actuarial analysis of patients who had endarterectomy indicated that the cumulative probability of ipsilateral stroke was 1.5% at 1 month and 2% at 5 years. The cumulative probability of ipsilateral stroke, transient ischemic attack, or reversible ischemic neurologic deficit was 4% at 1 month and 8% at 5 years or less than 1% per year after the first month, with censoring at the time of the second surgical procedure.
Medical subject headings
- Arteriosclerosis
- Carotid Artery Diseases
- Endarterectomy