Quality appraisal of diagnostic accuracy studies in fine-needle aspiration cytology: a survey of risk of bias and comparability.

Abstract

The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies is determined by 2 key factors: risk of bias and comparability. Bias can distort accuracy estimates and poor reporting impairs comparability. While diagnostic accuracy studies for fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) are frequently published, the methodologic issues associated with this body of literature have never been reviewed. To assess the quality of design and reporting of diagnostic test accuracy studies in FNAC. Diagnostic accuracy studies were identified by a Medline (US National Library of Medicine) search. Sixty-four FNAC diagnostic test accuracy studies were randomly selected for structured review with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) survey. Studies were divided between 2 time periods: 2000-2001 and 2009-2011. Diagnostic test accuracy studies of FNAC suffer from numerous deficiencies in study design, which negatively affect the reliability of accuracy estimates.