Reduced dislocation rates and excellent functional outcomes with large-diameter femoral heads.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 23602233.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2012.11.017.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the dislocation rates, functional outcomes, and radiographic results between large- and small-diameter femoral head components. A total of 225 patients (248-hips) who received total hip arthroplasties with large-diameter components (36mm or greater) were compared to 501 patients (559-hips) who received smaller diameter components (less than 36mm). Rates of dislocation and revision, Harris hip score, radiographic findings, and complications were compared between the groups. At a mean follow-up of approximately 5years, a significantly higher rate of dislocation was noted in the small-diameter group (10 of 559) compared to the large-diameter group (0 of 248). The overall implant survivorship, mean Harris hip scores, complication rates, and radiographic outcomes were similar for the two groups. The authors believe that large-diameter components significantly reduced the risk of dislocation in susceptible patients, while preserving good to excellent functional outcomes.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
- Femur Head
- Hip Dislocation
- Hip Joint
- Hip Prosthesis
- Osteoarthritis, Hip
Anatomy
- femur
- hip