Existing instruments for assessing physician communication skills: are they valid in a computerized setting?
other · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 23623463.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.pec.2013.03.017.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to highlight the differences in physicians' scores on two communication assessment tools: the SEGUE and an EMR-specific communication skills checklist. The first tool ignores the presence of the EMR in the exam room and the second, though not formally validated, rather focuses on it. METHODS: We use the Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test to compare physicians' scores on each of the tools during 16 simulated medical encounters that were rated by two different raters. RESULTS: Results show a significant difference between physicians' scores on each tool (z=-3.519, p<0.05 for the first rater, and z=-3.521, p<0.05 for the second rater), while scores on the EMR-specific communication skills checklist were significantly and consistently lower. CONCLUSION: These results imply that current communication assessment tools that do not incorporate items that are relevant for communication tasks during EMR use may produce inaccurate results. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: We therefore suggest that a new instrument, possibly an extension of existing ones, should be developed and empirically validated.