Three-year follow up utilizing tantal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty.
case_series · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 23664075.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2013.01.028.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
There still is no consensus on the treatment of choice in revision knee arthroplasty associated with severe femoral and/or tibial bone loss. A total of 44 patients underwent revision knee arthroplasty procedures using porous tantalum cones (TM cones) to reconstruct tibial and/or femoral bone defects. At latest follow up after 37 months (32-48), 38 patients remained in the study. Tibial and femoral bone loss was categorized according to the AORI-Classification. The average preoperative KSS improved from 34 (range, 6-90) to 63 points (range, 7-90 points). The VAS improved from 7.5 to 4.8. Two patients required a re-revision due to aseptic loosening. There was no correlation between the different types of knee prosthesis implanted. Our study shows favourable clinical and radiological outcomes using TM cones in managing significant bone loss in revision total knee surgery.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
- Knee Prosthesis
- Reoperation
Anatomy
- femur
- knee
- tibia