Suitability for subcutaneous defibrillator implantation: results based on data from routine clinical practice.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 23704324.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-303349.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To assess the proportion of current implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) recipients who would be suitable for a subcutaneous lead ICD (S-ICD). A retrospective cohort study. Tertiary care facility in the Netherlands. All patients who received a single- or dual-chamber ICD in the Leiden University Medical Center between 2002 and 2011. Patients with a pre-existent indication for cardiac pacing were excluded. Suitability for an S-ICD defined as not reaching one of the following endpoints during follow-up: (1) an atrial and/or right ventricular pacing indication, (2) successful antitachycardia pacing without a subsequent shock or (3) an upgrade to a CRT-D device. During a median follow-up of 3.4 years (IQR 1.7-5.7 years), 463 patients (34% of the total population of 1345 patients) reached an endpoint. The cumulative incidence of ICD recipients suitable for an initial S-ICD implantation was 55.5% (95% CI 52.0% to 59.0%) after 5 years. Significant predictors for the unsuitability of an S-ICD were: secondary prevention, severe heart failure and prolonged QRS duration. After 5 years of follow-up, approximately 55% of the patients would have been suitable for an S-ICD implantation. Several baseline clinical characteristics were demonstrated to be useful in the selection of patients suitable for an S-ICD implantation.
Medical subject headings
- Death, Sudden, Cardiac
- Defibrillators, Implantable
- Secondary Prevention
- Tachycardia, Ventricular