Preoperative prediction of failure following two-stage revision for knee prosthetic joint infections.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 23707344.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.016.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
While two-stage revision is the gold standard for treatment of knee prosthetic joint infection (PJI), it is not without risk. The purpose of this study was to develop a tool to preoperatively predict the probability that a two-stage revision would fail to eradicate knee PJI. 3,809 surgical cases were retrospectively reviewed and data were collected from 314 charts. Overall, 105 (33.4%) cases failed to eradicate PJI using this procedure. Univariate analysis identified multiple variables independently associated with reinfection. Logistic regression was used to generate a model (bootstrap-corrected concordance index of 0.773) predicting failure of infection eradication. Preoperative knowledge of a high probability of failure may improve risk assessment, lead to more aggressive management, and allow for time to consider alternative therapies.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
- Knee Joint
- Knee Prosthesis
- Prosthesis Failure
- Prosthesis-Related Infections
Anatomy
- knee