Minimum 20-year follow-up results of revision total hip arthroplasty with improved cementing technique.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 23759117.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.040.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
A consecutive, non-selective cohort of 83 (77 patients) cemented total hip arthroplasty revisions using contemporary cementing techniques was analyzed at a minimum of 20 years following the index procedure. No patients were lost to follow-up. The average age at revision was 62.4 years (23 to 89). Twenty-two hips (26.5%) had had a reoperation, eighteen (21.7%) for aseptic loosening, 3 (3.6%) for femoral prosthesis fracture and 1 (1.2%) for dislocation. The incidence of re-revision for aseptic femoral loosening was 7.5% and for aseptic acetabular loosening was 21.7%. These results confirm that cemented femoral revision using improved cementing techniques is a durable option in revision hip surgery. In contrast to this, THA revisions using a cemented acetabular component have been less durable at this length of follow-up.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
- Hip Joint
- Joint Diseases
- Prosthesis Failure
Anatomy
- hip