Universal antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection: should US treatment guidelines be applied to resource-limited settings?
expert_opinion · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 23759345.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1093/cid/cit382 and PMC identifier 3749746.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
US treatment guidelines now recommend antiretroviral therapy (ART) for all persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), regardless of CD4 count, both for the benefit of infected individuals and to prevent HIV transmission. In an effort to meet the critical goal of treating all HIV-infected persons worldwide, there is movement toward extrapolating these guidelines and the data supporting them to resource-limited settings. While economic and practical barriers to universal ART are widely recognized, there has been little discussion of the ethical considerations resulting from global disparities in the safety and efficacy of universal ART in these settings. We argue that the risk-benefit considerations for initiating ART are not the same worldwide due to limitations in the ART regimens used, laboratory monitoring, and consistent availability of ART, which raises ethical questions about universally applying US guidelines in resource-limited settings at the present time.
Medical subject headings
- Anti-Retroviral Agents
- Guideline Adherence
- HIV Infections
- Health Services Accessibility
- Quality Assurance, Health Care