Measuring enfranchisement: importance of and control over participation by people with disabilities.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 23769764.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.05.017.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To evaluate the psychometric properties and validity of an expanded set of community enfranchisement items that are suitable for computer adaptive testing. Survey. Community setting. Individuals with disabilities (N=1163) were recruited from an online panel generation company (51%), former rehabilitation inpatients (18%), disability community organizations (13%), a registry of rehabilitation patients (10%), and Traumatic Brain Injury and Spinal Cord Injury Model System facilities (8%). Inclusion criteria were a self-identified disability, aged ≥18 years, and the ability to read and speak English. None. Community enfranchisement. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of the 48 enfranchisement items suggested 2 distinct subsets of items: (1) importance of participation and (2) control over participation. Principal components analysis of the residuals suggested that the 2 item sets are unidimensional. Rating scale analysis provided evidence that the 2 item sets fit the Rasch model. Importance and control were moderately correlated with each other and with disability severity. Importance of participation and control over participation define 2 distinct sets of participation enfranchisement. Preliminary evidence supports their validity.
Medical subject headings
- Persons with Disabilities