A comparison of community-based and hospital-based head and neck cancer screening campaigns: identifying high-risk individuals and early disease.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 23787414.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.3153.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
An enduring challenge in the care of patients with head and neck cancer is identifying disease earlier. Appropriately designed screening campaigns are one proposed strategy. To determine whether a hospital-based or a community-based head and neck cancer (HNC) screening strategy is more effective in identifying high-risk individuals, signs and symptoms, and findings consistent with head and neck neoplasia. In this retrospective cohort analysis, data from HNC screening efforts held at a tertiary care medical center and at a local motorsports event were compared. Participants completed a questionnaire, and a focused physical examination was performed. Identification rates of high-risk individuals, signs and symptoms, and findings consistent with head and neck neoplasia. The hospital-based and community-based efforts yielded 210 and 1380 individuals screened, respectively. The community-based screening events attracted a significantly greater proportion of participants with risk factors of HNC including male sex (P < .001), current tobacco use (P < .001), lifetime history of tobacco use (P = .03), smokeless tobacco use (P = .003), and current alcohol use (P = .04). The hospital-based screening events, however, attracted a statistically greater proportion of people reporting prior head and neck or otolaryngologic treatment (P < .001), history of cancer outside the head and neck (P < .001), and a greater median number of symptoms (P < .001) and examination findings (P < .001). These data suggest that the 2 screening models attract 2 fundamentally different types of participants, and those in both groups may benefit from screening, albeit for different reasons: one has a higher rate of risk factors, and early-stage HNC might be discovered while it is more readily treatable; the other has a higher rate of concerning signs, symptoms, and findings, and screening might be used to diagnose or rule out HNC.
Medical subject headings
- Community Health Services
- Early Detection of Cancer
- Head and Neck Neoplasms
- Hospitals
- Mass Screening