Cost-effectiveness analysis of cervical length measurement and fibronectin testing in women with threatened preterm labor.
other · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 23791688.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.06.029.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The objective of the study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of risk stratification with cervical length (CL) measurement and/or fetal fibronectin (fFN) tests in women with threatened preterm labor between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation. We performed a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis to evaluate 7 test-treatment strategies in women with threatened preterm labor from a health care system perspective. Estimates on disease prevalence, costs, and test accuracy were based on medical literature. We found that additional fFN testing in the case of a CL between 10 and 30 mm is cost saving without compromising neonatal health outcomes, compared with a treat-all strategy or single CL testing. Implementing this strategy could lead to an annual cost saving between €2.8 million and €14.4 million in The Netherlands, a country with about 180,000 deliveries annually. In women with threatened preterm labor between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation, the most cost-effective test strategy uses a combination of CL and fFN testing.
Medical subject headings
- Cervical Length Measurement
- Fibronectins
- Health Care Costs
- Obstetric Labor, Premature
- Premature Birth
- Risk Assessment