Timeliness of intravenous thrombolysis via telestroke in Georgia.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 23839507.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001898.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Through 2-way live video and audio communication, telestroke enhances urgent treatment of patients with acute stroke in emergency departments (EDs) without immediate access to on-site specialists. To assess for opportunities to shorten the door to thrombolysis time, we measured multiple time intervals in a telestroke system. We retrospectively analyzed 115 records of consecutive acute stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis during a 20-month period via a statewide telestroke system in 17 EDs in Georgia. On the basis of times documented in the telestroke system, we calculated the time elapsed between the following events: ED arrival, telestroke patient registration, start of specialist consultation, head computed tomography, thrombolysis recommendation, and thrombolysis initiation. The most conspicuous delay was from ED arrival to telestroke patient registration (median, 39 minutes; interquartile range, 21-56). Median time from ED arrival to thrombolysis initiation was 88 minutes, interquartile range 75 to 105. Thrombolysis was initiated within 60 minutes from ED arrival in 13% of patients. The greatest opportunity to expedite acute thrombolysis via telestroke is by shortening the time from ED arrival to telestroke patient registration.
Medical subject headings
- Emergency Medical Services
- Stroke
- Telemedicine
- Thrombolytic Therapy