Is second generation metal-on-metal primary total hip arthroplasty with a 28 mm head a worthy option?: a 12- to 18-year follow-up study.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 23890829.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2013.06.022.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To determine whether MoM THA with a small head is still worthy of use, we investigated survivorship, complications, and factors influencing failure. Of 149 consecutive patients (195 hips), 141 (180 hips) of mean age 43 (19-55) years were available for review at a mean of 14.4 years postoperatively. Survivorship for cup revision for any cause was 97.8% at 18.4 years postoperatively. Nine hips generated complaints of groin pain; six showed periacetabular osteolysis, one had pain without radiological change, and two were diagnosed as symptomatic pseudotumors. Four of six hips with periacetabular osteolysis or aseptic loosening were revised. Surgery- and patient-related factors had no effect in results. Our results are encouraging, however, further study will be necessary to determine the incidence and fates of pseudotumors after MoM THA with a small head.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
- Hip Joint
- Hip Prosthesis
- Joint Diseases
Anatomy
- hip