Comparison of prediction model for cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction using artificial neural network and logistic regression analysis.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 23940593.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0070571 and PMC identifier 3734274.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop the artificial neural network (ANN) and multivariable logistic regression (LR) analyses for prediction modeling of cardiovascular autonomic (CA) dysfunction in the general population, and compare the prediction models using the two approaches. We analyzed a previous dataset based on a Chinese population sample consisting of 2,092 individuals aged 30-80 years. The prediction models were derived from an exploratory set using ANN and LR analysis, and were tested in the validation set. Performances of these prediction models were then compared. Univariate analysis indicated that 14 risk factors showed statistically significant association with the prevalence of CA dysfunction (P<0.05). The mean area under the receiver-operating curve was 0.758 (95% CI 0.724-0.793) for LR and 0.762 (95% CI 0.732-0.793) for ANN analysis, but noninferiority result was found (P<0.001). The similar results were found in comparisons of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values in the prediction models between the LR and ANN analyses. The prediction models for CA dysfunction were developed using ANN and LR. ANN and LR are two effective tools for developing prediction models based on our dataset.
Medical subject headings
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Neural Networks, Computer
- Regression Analysis