A biomechanical investigation of short segment spinal fixation for burst fractures with varying degrees of posterior disruption.

Abstract

A biomechanical study was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Fixateur Interne pedicle screw system and the Syracuse I-Plate anterior fixation system. A total of 12 fresh frozen cadaver spines were tested intact, after burst fracture was created and application of a fixation device (six each), and after six serial transections of posterior ligaments and bony structures. Spines were loaded to a maximum of 10 N-m in flexion, extension, left and right lateral bending, and clockwise and counter-clockwise rotation. Results indicate that both systems reduce spinal flexibility in flexion, extension, and lateral bend loading when used to reduce and fix a classic burst fracture without posterior disruption. No decrease in flexibility was found in axial rotation for either device. After transection of all posterior elements, the I-Plate construct became much more flexible than the intact spine in flexion, extension, and axial rotation loading. The internal fixator construct retained more stability than the I-Plate construct after transection of posterior elements in flexion and extension loading, but was considerably more flexible than the intact spine in axial rotation loading. The results imply that the posterior internal fixator provides much better stabilization than the anterior I-Plate for those cases in which there is a large amount of posterior disruption in addition to an anterior burst injury. Neither device provides extensive support in axial rotation loading.