Omental pedicle flaps following proctectomy: a systematic review.
systematic_review · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 24034172.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1111/codi.12394.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Abdominoperineal excision (APR) for cancer carries significant morbidity of the perineal wound. An omental pedicle graft has been used to fill the pelvis and limit attendant complications after radical extirpation of the anorectum. A review of the literature was conducted to determine whether omentoplasty following APR reduces perineal wound complications. Three major databases (PubMed, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library) were searched. The review included original articles reporting outcomes after APR and omentoplasty from January 1950 to July 2012. Fourteen studies involving 891 patients (mean age 61 years, 59.8% men) were included. Median follow-up was 13.5 months. A variety of omentoplasty techniques added a median of 20 min to the operating time. The mean rate of primary wound healing was 66.8%, time to wound healing 24 days and weighted mean wound infection rate 14.4% with omentoplasty compared with 50.1%, 79 days and 18.5% in patients having no omentoplasty. Omental mobilization, transfer and buttressing of primary perineal repair following proctectomy reduces perineal wound morbidity with minimal additional operating time or flap-associated morbidity.
Medical subject headings
- Omentum
- Perineum
- Postoperative Complications
- Rectal Neoplasms
- Surgical Flaps
- Wound Closure Techniques
- Wound Healing