Do margins matter? The influence of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer-specific mortality.

Abstract

Positive surgical margins (PSMs) in radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens are a frequent indication for adjuvant radiotherapy and are used as a measure of surgical quality. However, the association between PSMs and prostate cancer-specific mortality (CSM) is poorly defined. Analyze the association of PSMs with CSM, adjusting for fixed and time-dependent parameters. Fine and Gray competing risk regression analysis was used to model the clinical data and follow-up information of 11,521 patients treated by RP between 1987 and 2005. Two extended models were used that adjusted for the use of postoperative radiotherapy, which was handled as a time-dependent covariate. Postoperative radiotherapy was modeled as a single parameter and also as early and late therapy, based on the prostate-specific antigen level at the start of treatment (≤0.5 vs >0.5 ng/ml). RP for clinically localized prostate cancer and selective use of secondary local and/or systemic therapy. The outcome measure was prostate cancer-specific mortality. The 15-yr CSM rates for patients with PSMs and negative surgical margins were 10% and 6%, respectively (p<0.001). No significant association between PSM and CSM was observed in the conventional model with fixed covariates (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7-1.5; p=0.8) or in the two extended models that adjusted for postoperative radiotherapy (HR: 0.96; 95% CI, 0.7-1.4; p=0.9), or early and late postoperative radiotherapy (HR: 1.01; 95% CI, 0.7-1.4; p=0.9). PSMs alone are not associated with a significantly increased risk of CSM within 15 yr of RP. However, urologists should continue to strive to avoid PSMs, as they increase a man's risk of biochemical recurrence and need for secondary therapy and may be a source of considerable patient anxiety.