Failures and revisions in surgery for sagittal imbalance: analysis of factors influencing failure.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 24061972.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s00586-013-3024-x and PMC identifier 3830040.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Sagittal imbalance is an important risk factor for spinal disability, pain and loss of health related quality of life. Its correction has a positive impact on these outcomes. Still, it is a very aggressive surgery, with a high revision rate. The aim of this study is to analyze the most important causes of failure of surgery for correction of sagittal imbalance. In this retrospective observational cohort study twelve patients who previously underwent surgery for sagittal imbalance correction were revised in the period 2009-10. We analyzed angular parameters of sagittal balance before and after primary surgery, type of instrumentation, modality of fusion, implant density, instrumented levels, modality of failure, time from first surgery and angular parameters after revision. Causes of failure were insufficient correction, junctional kyphosis, screw loosening and pseudoarthrosis with rod breakage. In every case, patients presented a new onset or a worsening of sagittal imbalance and pain.
Medical subject headings
- Internal Fixators
- Kyphosis
- Spinal Fusion