Comparison of combined transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation with surgical resection by using propensity score matching in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma within Milan criteria.

Abstract

To retrospectively compare the outcome of combined transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (hereafter, TACE-RFA) with that of surgical resection (SR) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within the Milan criteria. Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. From January 2000 to December 2010, 154 patients (mean age, 69.9 years; age range, 50-89 years; 107 men, 47 women) underwent TACE-RFA, and 176 patients (mean age, 66.9 years; age range, 29-83 years; 128 men, 48 women) underwent SR. Patients with HCC who underwent TACE-RFA or SR were enrolled if they met the following inclusion criteria: no previous HCC treatment, one HCC lesion no larger than 5 cm or up to three nodules smaller than 3 cm without vascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis, and Child-Pugh class A or B disease. Cumulative overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were compared after adjustment with propensity score matching. After this adjustment, OS rates were comparable between the groups (P = .393), but DFS was superior in the SR group (P < .048). Among patients with very early stage HCC (lesions <2 cm in diameter), OS and DFS rates in the SR group were significantly higher than those in the TACE-RFA group (P < .001 and P = .008, respectively). However, adjustment with propensity score matching yielded comparable OS and DFS rates between the two groups (P = .348 and P = .614, respectively). TACE-RFA may be a viable alternative treatment for early-stage HCC when SR is not feasible.