Comparison of pathology of chronic total occlusion with and without coronary artery bypass graft.

Abstract

The aim of our study was to investigate chronic total occlusion (CTO) in human coronary arteries to clarify the difference between CTO with prior coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and those without prior CABG. A total of 95 CTO lesions from 82 patients (61.6 ± 14.0 years, male 87.8%) were divided into the following three groups: CTO with CABG (n = 34) (CTO+CABG), CTO without CABG--of long-duration (n = 49) (LD-CTO) and short-duration (n = 12) (SD-CTO). A histopathological comparison of the plaque characteristics of CTO, proximal and distal lumen morphology, and negative remodelling between groups was performed. A total of 1127 sections were evaluated. Differences in plaque characteristics were observed between groups as follows: necrotic core area was highest in SD-CTO (18.6%) (LD-CTO: 7.8%; CTO+CABG: 4.5%; P = 0.02); calcified area was greatest in CTO+CABG (29.2%) (LD-CTO: 16.8%; SD-CTO: 12.1%; P = 0.009); and negative remodelling was least in SD-CTO [remodelling index (RI) 0.86] [CTO+CABG (RI): 0.72 and LD-CTO (RI): 0.68; P < 0.001]. Approximately 50% of proximal lumens showed characteristics of abrupt closure, whereas the majority of distal lumen patterns were tapered (79%) (P < 0.0001). These pathological differences in calcification, negative remodelling, and presence of necrotic core along with proximal and distal tapering, which has been associated with greater success, help explain the differences in success rates of percutaneous coronary intervention in CTO patients with and without CABG.