Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of Lichtenstein's operation versus mesh plug repair for inguinal hernia.

Abstract

To compare long-term results of Lichtenstein's operation versus mesh plug repair for open inguinal hernia repair. The technique of best choice in open prosthetic inguinal hernia repair remains a subject of ongoing debate. In this prospective, randomized controlled multicenter trial, patients with primary or recurrent inguinal hernias were randomized to undergo either Lichtenstein's operation or mesh plug repair. The primary endpoint was the long-term recurrence rate. Secondary endpoints included chronic pain, sensibility disorders, and reoperation rate. In total, 697 hernias in 594 patients were randomized (297 patients per group). At a median follow-up of 6.5 years, 528 (76%) operated hernias in 444 (75%) patients were clinically evaluated. The recurrence rate was similar in both groups [mesh plug: 21/268 hernias = 7.8%; Lichtenstein: 21/260 hernias = 8.1%; adjusted odds ratio (OR): 0.92; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.51, 1.68; P = 0.795]. We did not find a significant difference for chronic pain (Visual Analog Scale score >3) (OR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.31, 1.09; P = 0.088) and sensory testing (17% vs 20% of patients; OR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.21, 1.37; P = 0.190) between the 2 groups. There were less reoperations in the mesh plug than in the Lichtenstein's operation group (OR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.22, 0.85; P = 0.016). The long-term results of this trial indicate not enough evidence for differences in recurrence, chronic pain, and sensibility disorders between mesh plug repair and Lichtenstein's operation but a lower likelihood for reoperation for mesh plug repair. Estimates for all endpoints were statistically not significant or based on large CIs. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01637818.