The short stem: promises and pitfalls.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 24187354.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.32936.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Conventional uncemented femoral implants provide dependable long-term fixation in patients with a wide range of functional requirements. Yet challenges associated with proximal-distal femoral dimensional mismatch, preservation of bone stock, and minimally invasive approaches have led to exploration into alternative implant designs. Short stem designs focusing on a stable metaphyseal fit have emerged to address these issues in total hip replacement (THR). Uncemented metaphyseal-engaging short stem implants are stable and are associated with proximal bone remodeling closer to the metaphysis when compared with conventional stems and they also have comparable clinical performances. Short stem metaphyseal-engaging implants can meet the goals of a successful THR, including tolerating a high level of patient function, as well as durable fixation.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
- Femur
- Hip Prosthesis
- Prosthesis Design
Anatomy
- femur
- hip