Reliability of laryngostroboscopic evaluation on lesion size and glottal configuration: a revisit.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 24222186.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/lary.24521.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
This study investigated the inter-rater and intrarater reliability of four basic visual perceptual parameters (lesion size rating and glottal configuration) in laryngostroboscopic evaluation. Cohort Study. Two hundred fifty-five laryngostroboscopic video samples were evaluated by three raters on four measurements: 1) mass lesion size rating, 2) amplitude of vocal fold vibration, 3) supraglottic activity, and 4) shape of the glottal closure using the modified Stroboscopy Examination Rating Form. Good inter- and intrarater reliability were found in rating the lesion size (0.75-0.81, P=.001), anteroposterior supraglottic activity (0.64, P=.001), and glottal closure (0.65, P=.001). Inter-rater reliability in evaluating the mediolateral supraglottic activity and the amplitude of vocal fold vibration were low to moderate (0.50 and 0.46, respectively, P=.001), whereas the intrarater reliability was more variable (0.2-0.70). The findings indicated that the evaluation of static structures like lesion size rating, the anteroposterior supraglottic compression, and the glottal closure is a relatively reliable method. The evaluation of dynamic structures, such as the vocal fold vibratory amplitude measure was, however, found to be of low reliability. NA.
Medical subject headings
- Glottis
- Laryngeal Diseases
- Laryngoscopy
- Phonation
- Stroboscopy
- Vocal Cords
- Voice Quality