Does prompt treatment of urinary tract infection in preschool children prevent renal scarring: mixed retrospective and prospective audits.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 24351607.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1136/archdischild-2013-304428 and PMC identifier 3963540.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To test whether active management of urinary tract infections (UTI) in young children by general practitioners can reduce kidney scarring rates. A comparison of two audits in Newcastle, of children aged <8 years, presenting with UTIs ; a retrospective audit of conventional management during 1992-1995 (1990s) versus a prospective audit of direct access management during 2004-2011 (2000s). Kidney scarring rates, and their relationship with time-to-treat. Children with a first UTI in the 2000s compared to those in the 1990s, were referred younger, were half as likely to have a renal scar (girls OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.76; boys 0.35, 0.16 to 0.81), and were about 12 times more likely to have vesicoureteric reflux without scarring (girls 11.9, 4.3 to 33.5; boys 14.4, 4.3 to 47.6). In the 2000s, general practitioners treated about half the children at first consultation. Children who were treated within 3 days of their symptoms starting were one-third as likely to scar as those whose symptoms lasted longer (0.33, 0.12 to 0.72). Most kidney defects seen in children after UTIs, are acquired scars, and in Newcastle, active management in primary care has halved this rate.
Medical subject headings
- Anti-Bacterial Agents
- Cicatrix
- Kidney Diseases
- Urinary Tract Infections