Mesothelioma in occupational cohort studies: methodological considerations.
case_control · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 24351897.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000059.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
This article describes effective strategies for the identification and valid assessment of mortality due to mesothelioma. We manually reviewed all death certificates for mention of mesothelioma for all International Classification of Diseases (ICD) revisions. We tested the accuracy of our ascertainment method by comparing New Jersey death certificate data from our health status registry with histologically confirmed cases from the New Jersey State Cancer Registry. We found reasonably good agreement between death certificate diagnoses and histologically confirmed cases, κ coefficient 0.86 (95% confidence interval, 0.76 to 0.95). Most mesothelioma deaths in our test and North American cohorts were coded to unspecified anatomical sites. Limiting ascertainment to pleura and peritoneum ICD codes underestimates mesothelioma deaths. Reviewing all ICD codes that could contain mesothelioma is the only effective method for complete capture of mesothelioma diagnoses.
Medical subject headings
- Death Certificates
- Mesothelioma
- Occupational Diseases
- Peritoneal Neoplasms
- Pleural Neoplasms
- Registries