Diagnostic role of core needle biopsy in cervical lymphadenopathy.
case_series · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 24375555.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/hed.23580.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of core needle biopsy (CNB) compared to fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in cervical lymphadenopathy. This consecutive case series enrolled 208 patients with cervical lymphadenopathy. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were evaluated and the necessity of an additional open biopsy was compared. The sensitivity and NPV for critical disease (lymphoma, carcinoma, and tuberculosis) were significantly higher with CNB (p = .006, p = .001, respectively) than with FNAC. In the analysis based on specific disease, the sensitivity of CNB was statistically significantly higher (p = .009) for the diagnosis of lymphoma. The rate of open biopsy for confirmative diagnosis was significantly lower with CNB (p = .014). CNB is beneficial for initial examination in cervical lymphadenopathy and showed higher sensitivity and NPV than FNAC. It is especially useful for screening for lymphoma.
Medical subject headings
- Biopsy, Needle
- Lymph Nodes