Surgical site infection: A comparison of multispecialty and single specialty outpatient facilities.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 24396225.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jor.2013.07.005 and PMC identifier 3861674.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Reoperation secondary to surgical site infections can be a devastating complication in orthopaedic surgery. Infection rates in the ambulatory setting have been reported to be lower than those cited in a hospital setting. However, a direct comparative analysis of infection rates of orthopaedic procedures performed in a single specialty ambulatory surgical center (ASC) versus a multi-specialty ASC has, to our knowledge, not been performed. Four surgeons performed more than 10,000 orthopaedic surgeries in a multispecialty and single specialty ambulatory setting over 8 years. These procedures were reviewed for postoperative deep infection within one year of initial operation. The post-surgical deep infection rate in a multi-specialty ASC was 0.81% in 2867 operations compared with a rate of 0.38% in 7311 operations performed in a single specialty ASC (p = 0.007). This study demonstrated that the rate of infection leading to reoperation was significantly lower in a single specialty ambulatory surgery setting as opposed to one accommodating multiple specialties.