Evaluation of a new geriatric foot versus the Solid Ankle Cushion Heel foot for low-activity amputees.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 24418934.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1177/0309364613515492.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
It is always a challenge to rehabilitate geriatric amputees to perform self-care skills at home with limited ambulation. A new geriatric foot (with a lower effective foot length) has been specifically designed to reduce residual limb stress and to ease the step completion. The aim of this study is to evaluate the benefit of a new geriatric foot versus a Solid Ankle Cushion Heel foot for low-activity persons with transtibial amputation. Crossover study. A total of 12 patients were included in this study. 2-min walking test, Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 questionnaire and pressure socket measurements. The geriatric foot allows for greater patient satisfaction. The maximal pressure was significantly lower in the proximal anterior stump area. No statistical differences were obtained from the 2-min walking test. A geriatric foot designed with a low effective foot length improves the satisfaction and reduces proximal anterior socket pressures for poor-performing persons with transtibial amputation. The development and evaluation of feet specifically designed for geriatric persons with transtibial amputation could improve their specific requirements and satisfaction.
Medical subject headings
- Amputees
- Foot
- Health Services for the Aged
- Prostheses and Implants
- Walking
Anatomy
- ankle
- foot