Shared decision-making in back pain consultations: an illusion or reality?
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 24477377.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s00586-014-3187-0 and PMC identifier 3946094.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Amid a political agenda for patient-centred healthcare, shared decision-making is reported to substantially improve patient experience, adherence to treatment and health outcomes. However, observational studies have shown that shared decision-making is rarely implemented in practice. The purpose of this study was to measure the prevalence of shared decision-making in clinical encounters involving physiotherapists and patients with back pain. Eighty outpatient encounters (comprising 40 h of data) were observed audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the 12-item OPTION scale. The higher the score, the greater is the shared decision-making competency of the clinicians. The mean OPTION score was 24.0% (range 10.4-43.8%). Shared decision-making was under-developed in the observed back pain consultations. Clinicians' strong desire to treat acted as a barrier to shared decision-making and further work should focus on when and how it can be implemented.
Medical subject headings
- Back Pain
- Decision Making
- Patient Participation
- Physical Therapists
- Professional-Patient Relations