End of life discussion in an academic family health team in kingston, ontario, Canada.
other · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 24479094.
- Also identified by DOI 10.4103/2249-4863.120749 and PMC identifier PMC3495910.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: End-of-life (EOL) discussions remain difficult in non-terminal patients as death is often perceived as a taboo and uncertainty. However, the call for proper EOL discussions has recently received public attention and media coverage. Evidence also reveals that non-terminal patients are more satisfied with health-care encounters when EOL has been discussed. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: The objective of this study was to explore the prevalence of EOL discussions in non-terminal adult patients, the perceived barriers to such discussions and suggested methods for improvement. A study mixed-methods study was performed by a group of PGY1 family medicine residents in an academic health team in Kingston, Ontario. RESULTS: EOL discussion was performed in a very small proportion of non-terminal patient encounters. Compared with attending physicians, residents were less likely to discuss EOL issues and reported more perceived barriers. CONCLUSION: Our findings reflect the need for an early and open approach in conducting EOL discussion for non-terminal healthy patients.