Comparisons of preoperative three-dimensional planning and surgical reconstruction in primary cementless total hip arthroplasty.
case_series · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 24502952.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2013.12.033.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Reconstruction of important parameters such as femoral offset and torsion is inaccurate, when templating is based on plain x-rays. We evaluate intraoperative reproducibility of pre-operative CT-based 3D-templating in a consecutive series of 50 patients undergoing primary cementless THA through an anterior approach. Pre-operative planning was compared to a postoperative CT scan by image fusion. The implant size was correctly predicted in 100% of the stems, 94% of the cups and 88% of the heads (length). The difference between the planned and the postoperative leg length was 0.3 + 2.3 mm. Values for overall offset, femoral anteversion, cup inclination and anteversion were 1.4 mm ± 3.1, 0.6° ± 3.3°, -0.4° ± 5° and 6.9° ± 11.4°, respectively. This planning allows accurate implant size prediction. Stem position and cup inclination are accurately reproducible.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
- Hip Joint
- Joint Diseases
Anatomy
- femur
- hip