Patient-specific instrumentation does not improve alignment in total knee arthroplasty.
meta_analysis · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 24504637.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1055/s-0034-1368143.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) was developed to improve the accuracy of component positioning in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A meta-analysis of level I and level II studies was performed to determine if PSI improves the mechanical alignment of the leg compared with conventional instrumentation (CI) in TKA. Seven studies met inclusion criteria evaluating 559 patients undergoing TKA. Mean coronal alignment was within 1 degree of neutral mechanical alignment in both groups (PSI, 0.78 degrees; CI, 0.81 degrees). There were fewer outliers in the PSI group (21.1%) than in the CI group (23.2%), but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.59). On the basis of the data from this analysis, PSI does not significantly improve the postoperative mechanical alignment of the limb after TKA. Moreover, PSI does not decrease the number of outliers compared with CI.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
- Bone Malalignment
- Knee Joint
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
- Surgery, Computer-Assisted
Anatomy
- knee