Reference values and psychometric properties of the lower extremity motor coordination test.

Abstract

(1) To create predictive nomograms for the dominant and nondominant limbs on the Lower Extremity Motor Coordination Test (LEMOCOT) using reference values, and (2) to determine the inter- and intrarater reliability for the LEMOCOT; the best scoring method (first vs mean of the first 2 vs mean of the last 2 vs mean of 3 vs the highest of 3 trials); the best testing method (direct vs video observation); and the ability to detect real change (smallest real difference [SRD] and standard error of the measurement [SEM]). Normative and methodological study. Metropolitan area. Healthy individuals (N=320, 50% women) in 7 age groups: 20 to 29, 30 to 39, 40 to 49, 50 to 59, 60 to 69, 70 to 79, and ≥80 years. Each group had 50 participants, except for ≥80 years (n=20). Not applicable. Age and sex explained 48% of the variance in the LEMOCOT scores for the dominant limb and 44% for the nondominant limb (125<F<148; P<.001). No significant differences were found regarding the different scoring methods (.12<F<1.02; .10<P<.92), and all of them demonstrated good reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients between .90 and .99; P<.001). There was agreement between scores from direct and video observation (limits of agreement -1.99 to 1.85; -1.55 to 1.62). Appropriate SEM (2.27-1.85) and SRD (6.27-5.11) values were found. Reference values were determined for the LEMOCOT, and predictive nomograms were created based on age and sex. The LEMOCOT is reliable, needing only 1 trial (after familiarization) to generate reliable scores; can be scored from either direct or video observation; and has the ability to detect real change over time.