Letter to the Editor: On the term 'interaction' and related phrases in the literature on Random Forests.
editorial · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 24723569.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1093/bib/bbu012 and PMC identifier 4364067.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
In an interesting and quite exhaustive review on Random Forests (RF) methodology in bioinformatics Touw et al. address--among other topics--the problem of the detection of interactions between variables based on RF methodology. We feel that some important statistical concepts, such as 'interaction', 'conditional dependence' or 'correlation', are sometimes employed inconsistently in the bioinformatics literature in general and in the literature on RF in particular. In this letter to the Editor, we aim to clarify some of the central statistical concepts and point out some confusing interpretations concerning RF given by Touw et al. and other authors.
Medical subject headings
- Algorithms
- Biological Science Disciplines
- Data Mining