Intrafractional tracking accuracy in infrared marker-based hybrid dynamic tumour-tracking irradiation with a gimballed linac.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 24746563.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.02.018.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To verify the intrafractional tracking accuracy in infrared (IR) marker-based hybrid dynamic tumour tracking irradiation ("IR Tracking") with the Vero4DRT. The gimballed X-ray head tracks a moving target by predicting its future position from displacements of IR markers in real-time. Ten lung cancer patients who underwent IR Tracking were enrolled. The 95th percentiles of intrafractional mechanical (iEM(95)), prediction (iEP(95)), and overall targeting errors (iET(95)) were calculated from orthogonal fluoroscopy images acquired during tracking irradiation and from the synchronously acquired log files. Averaged intrafractional errors were (left-right, cranio-caudal [CC], anterior-posterior [AP])=(0.1mm, 0.4mm, 0.1mm) for iEM(95), (1.2mm, 2.7mm, 2.1mm) for iEP(95), and (1.3mm, 2.4mm, 1.4mm) for iET(95). By correcting systematic prediction errors in the previous field, the iEP(95) was reduced significantly, by an average of 0.4mm in the CC (p<0.05) and by 0.3mm in the AP (p<0.01) directions. Prediction errors were the primary cause of overall targeting errors, whereas mechanical errors were negligible. Furthermore, improvement of the prediction accuracy could be achieved by correcting systematic prediction errors in the previous field.
Medical subject headings
- Fiducial Markers
- Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography
- Infrared Rays
- Lung Neoplasms
- Radiotherapy, Image-Guided