Adhesion prevention after cesarean delivery: evidence, and lack of it.
systematic_review · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 24858198.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.05.027.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
In spite of the recognized occurrence of cesarean-attributable adhesions, its clinical significance is uncertain. The presence of adhesions during a repeat cesarean section can make fetal extraction lengthy and the procedure challenging and may increase the risk of injury to adjacent organs. Two methods for adhesion prevention are discussed, peritoneal closure and use of adhesion barriers. Peritoneal closure appears to be safe in the short term. In the long term, conflicting evidence arise from reviewing the literature for possible adhesion reduction benefits. A systematic review of the literature on the use of adhesion barriers in the context of cesarean section yielded only a few studies, most of which are lacking in methodology. For now, it appears that the available evidence does not support the routine use of adhesion barriers during cesarean delivery.
Medical subject headings
- Abdominal Wound Closure Techniques
- Cesarean Section
- Peritoneal Diseases
- Peritoneum
- Uterine Diseases