Feasibility, effectiveness and costs associated with a web-based follow-up assessment following total joint arthroplasty.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 24881023.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2014.04.003.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility, effectiveness and costs of a web-based follow-up compared to in-person assessment following primary total hip or total knee arthroplasty. Patients who were at least 12 months postoperative were randomized to follow-up method. We excluded patients who had revision surgery, osteolysis, complications or identified radiographic issues. 229 patients (118 Web, 111 in-person) completed the study. There were no patients who had an issue missed by the web-based follow-up. Patients in the web-based group travelled less (28.2km vs 103.7km, (P<0.01)), had lower associated costs ($10.45 vs $21.36, (P<0.01)) and took less time to complete (121.7min web vs 228.7min usual). Web-based follow-up is a feasible, clinically effective alternative with lower associated costs than in-person clinic assessment.
Medical subject headings
- Ambulatory Care
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
- Internet
- Osteoarthritis, Hip
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
Anatomy
- hip
- knee