Temporal trends in head and neck cancer surgery reconstruction.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 24890759.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/hed.23786.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to analyze changing trends in head and neck cancer reconstructive surgery and analyze the effect of surgeon and hospital volume. Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) for 133,850 patients who underwent a major ablative procedure for a malignant oral cavity, laryngeal, hypopharyngeal, or oropharyngeal neoplasm in 1993 to 2010 were analyzed using cross-tabulations and multivariate regression. Reconstructive surgery in 2001 to 2010 was significantly associated with prior radiation (odds ratio [OR] = 2.6; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 1.4-4.9), comorbidity (OR = 1.6; 95% CI = 1.1-2.2), laryngeal cancer (OR = 0.7; 95% CI = 0.6-0.9), oropharyngeal cancer (OR = 0.5; 95% CI = 0.4-0.7), high-volume hospitals (OR = 3.9; 95% CI = 1.5-10.2), and high-volume surgeons (OR = 2.0; 95% CI = 1.1-3.9), compared to 1993-2000. Reconstruction by high-volume surgeons was significantly associated with prior radiation (OR = 1.8; 95% CI = 1.1-3.1) and lower in-hospital mortality (OR = 0.3; 95% CI = 0.1-1.0). A statistically significant negative correlation was observed between high-volume surgeons and length of hospitalization and hospital-related costs. These data reflect changing trends in head and neck cancer reconstructive surgery, with meaningful differences in the type of surgical care provided by high-volume surgeons.
Medical subject headings
- Head and Neck Neoplasms
- Hospital Costs
- Hospital Mortality
- Plastic Surgery Procedures