Pharmacologic prophylaxis alone is not adequate to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 24896759.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1038/ajg.2014.123.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) remains the most common complication following ERCP. Although once considered unpredictable, understanding patient and procedure-related risk factors, and measures such as pancreatic stent placement and pharmacoprophylaxis have been shown to substantially decrease the risk of PEP. In this issue of the Journal, the role of pharmacoprophylaxis is explored in a study comparing rectal indomethacin plus sublingual nitrates vs. rectal indomethacin alone. While showing improved efficacy, dual pharmacoprophylaxis does not appear adequate to obviate the importance of technique-related variables and pancreatic stents. Rather, a comprehensive approach is likely to be the most efficacious strategy to reduce PEP.
Medical subject headings
- Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde
- Indomethacin
- Nitrates
- Pancreatitis