One-component revision in total hip arthroplasty: the fate of the retained component.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 24939637.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2014.05.005.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the long-term outcome of the unrevised part in one-component total hip arthroplasty revision (index operation). Forty-four patients (46 hips) with a mean age of 58years at the time of the index operation were included. At the final follow-up, 4 of the 19 (21%) unrevised acetabular components and 6 of the 27 (22%) unrevised femoral components were subsequently revised at a mean time of 14 and 11years from the index operation, and 22 and 24years from the primary operation, respectively. We concluded that revision of a stable component is not justifiable on the basis of its long duration in use or non-ideal position or possible loosening on radiographs.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
- Hip Joint
- Hip Prosthesis
- Joint Diseases
- Prosthesis Failure
Anatomy
- hip
- femur