Science communication. Response to Comment on "Quantifying long-term scientific impact".
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 25013056.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1126/science.1248961.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Wang, Mei, and Hicks claim that they observed large mean prediction errors when using our model. We find that their claims are a simple consequence of overfitting, which can be avoided by standard regularization methods. Here, we show that our model provides an effective means to identify papers that may be subject to overfitting, and the model, with or without prior treatment, outperforms the proposed naïve approach.
Medical subject headings
- Journal Impact Factor
- Models, Theoretical