Evaluation of functional restoration outcomes for chronic disabling occupational cervical disorders.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 25046323.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000204.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To systematically evaluate the effectiveness of an interdisciplinary functional restoration program (FRP) for treating chronic cervical disorders. Consecutive chronic occupational lumbar disorder patients (n = 898) and chronic occupational cervical disorder patients (n = 215) were admitted to an FRP from 2001 to 2011. Patients were compared on demographics, work-related and psychosocial factors, and socioeconomic outcomes 1 year after discharge. Compared with lumbar patients, cervical patients were more likely to be female, have preadmission surgery, perform white-collar work, and have a longer time between injury and treatment admission. Cervical patients were similar to lumbar patients on most psychosocial self-report outcome measures. In addition, both groups exhibited high work return and work retention rates 1 year after FRP discharge. An FRP seems to be equally efficacious for treating both chronic occupational cervical and lumbar disorders.
Medical subject headings
- Disability Evaluation
- Occupational Diseases
- Outcome Assessment, Health Care
- Recovery of Function
- Spinal Diseases