Timing the provision of a pregnancy decision-aid: temporal patterns of preference for mode of birth during pregnancy.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 25082724.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.pec.2014.07.011.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To help identify the optimal timing for provision of pregnancy decision-aids, this paper examines temporal patterns in women's preference for mode of birth after previous cesarean, prior to a decision-aid intervention. METHODS: Pregnant women (n=212) with one prior cesarean responded to surveys regarding their preference for elective repeat cesarean delivery (ERCD) or trial of labor (TOL) at 12-18 weeks and again at 28 weeks gestation. Patterns of adherence or change in preference were examined. RESULTS: Women's preferences for birth were not set in early pregnancy. There was evidence of increasing uncertainty about preferred mode of birth during the first two trimesters of pregnancy (McNemar value=4.41, p=0.04), decrease in preference for TOL (McNemar value=3.79, p=0.05) and stability in preference for ERCD (McNemar value=0.31, p=0.58). Adherence to early pregnancy choice was associated with previous birth experience, maternal country of birth, emotional state and hospital site. CONCLUSION: Women's growing uncertainty about mode of birth prior to 28 weeks indicates potential readiness for a decision-aid earlier in pregnancy. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Pregnancy decision-aids affecting mode of birth could be provided early in pregnancy to increase women's opportunity to improve knowledge, clarify personal values and reduce decision uncertainty.