Impact of centralising acute stroke services in English metropolitan areas on mortality and length of hospital stay: difference-in-differences analysis.

Abstract

To investigate whether centralisation of acute stroke services in two metropolitan areas of England was associated with changes in mortality and length of hospital stay. Analysis of difference-in-differences between regions with patient level data from the hospital episode statistics database linked to mortality data supplied by the Office for National Statistics. Acute stroke services in Greater Manchester and London, England. 258,915 patients with stroke living in urban areas and admitted to hospital in January 2008 to March 2012. "Hub and spoke" model for acute stroke care. In London hyperacute care was provided to all patients with stroke. In Greater Manchester hyperacute care was provided to patients presenting within four hours of developing symptoms of stroke. Mortality from any cause and at any place at 3, 30, and 90 days after hospital admission; length of hospital stay. In London there was a significant decline in risk adjusted mortality at 3, 30, and 90 days after admission. At 90 days the absolute reduction was -1.1% (95% confidence interval -2.1 to -0.1; relative reduction 5%), indicating 168 fewer deaths (95% confidence interval 19 to 316) during the 21 month period after reconfiguration in London. In both areas there was a significant decline in risk adjusted length of hospital stay: -2.0 days in Greater Manchester (95% confidence interval -2.8 to -1.2; 9%) and -1.4 days in London (-2.3 to -0.5; 7%). Reductions in mortality and length of hospital stay were largely seen among patients with ischaemic stroke. A centralised model of acute stroke care, in which hyperacute care is provided to all patients with stroke across an entire metropolitan area, can reduce mortality and length of hospital stay.