When performance management works: a study of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.
case_series · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 25099899.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/cncr.28817 and PMC identifier 8855666.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Little empirical evidence exists about the effectiveness of performance management systems in government. This study assessed the effectiveness of the performance management system of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) and explored why it works. Generalized estimating equation models were used to assess change in program performance after the implementation of a performance management system. In addition, qualitative case study data including observations, interviews, and document review were analyzed using inductive methods. Five of the 7 indicators tested had statistically significant increases in performance postimplementation. Case study results suggest that the system is characterized by high-quality data, measures viewed by grantees as meaningful and fair, and institutionalized data use. Several factors help to explain the system's effectiveness including characteristics of the NBCCEDP program (eg, service delivery program), qualities of the indicators (eg, process level), financial investment in the system, and a culture of data use.
Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
- Early Detection of Cancer
- Mass Screening
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms